This work is available here free, so that those who cannot afford it can still have access to it, and so that no one has to pay before they read something that might not be what they really are seeking. But if you find it meaningful and helpful and would like to contribute whatever easily affordable amount you feel it is worth, please do do. I will appreciate it.
Nihilism Do you believe that life does end, or may end, at death?
Everyone who believes that death may be the end should read the following short essay. It represents a serious attempt to help you recognize questions you probably already have on your mind. We will suggest that, whether they realize and admit it or not, anyone who does not believe in an "afterlife" may in fact be a "nihilist".
We will be discussing the oxymoron that true Nihilists believe in "nothing". We will also suggest that any use of the word Nihilism that includes active destruction of anything is an unjustified extension of the concepts underlying nihilism.
We will suggest that while Nihilism does not condone negative acts, it is equally true that there are no logical grounds for what is often called "positive" nihilism, which is sometimes associated with Humanism and Rationalism.
In doing so we will be questioning the very foundation of the works of modern philosophers who argue that one may find or create "value" in a world without a life after death, a humanistic, nihilistic world. There are many, many, sincere people who champion a rationalist, humanistic, worldview.
They present convincing logical arguments that lead to the conclusion there is no life after death. The goal of this essay is to present straightforward arguments for my conclusions.
Most people start with what they believe to be a basic understanding of "nothing". Many secular thinkers embrace the idea that there is nothing after physical death, yet at some point in their lives experience angst when they recognize the logical consequences of what they believe.
They seek ways to avoid what they think they have discovered by redefining nihilism. I believe that this almost universal response to nihilism is misguided because of a fundamental misunderstanding of "nothing" as being like the Cheshire cat, not real yet not unreal.
We will discuss what I believe is the true nature of "nothing" and then suggest an appropriate response. Nihilism should equate to "nothing", yet it is most often associated with a belief system characterized by an enthusiastic mental animation of what we might call nothingness.
Most philosophers recognize the ultimate simplicity of nihilism, yet almost every intellectual faced with nihilistic thoughts refuses to resist the human urge to literally make something out of nothing.
Human nature instinctively fights against any suggestion that absolutely nothing may be in our future. Before proceeding I should say that I am not a nihilist. I am a theist who believes that our past, present, and future have meaning and purpose.
If you find the conclusions of this book troubling then please read the other books before deciding for yourself what you choose to believe. This essay is a collection of thoughts about Nihilism.
It is the culmination of a lifetime of observing sincere individuals struggling with the concepts and consequences of nihilistic thoughts. Over the years it has varied in content, from a fairly long book to the current short essay, which is basically four chapters taken from our books.
It is primarily meant to introduce the discussion which is presented in the books. There is a risk that as you read this essay you may think we are suggesting that there is no "reason to live".
That is not what we are saying at all!
In fact we are saying the opposite, we have abundant hope that if you search within, you will find in yourself the reason for living. If you are discouraged or depressed, please finish reading all of this essay and then read our other books.The Definition of Death Rick Garlikov.
The attempts by legislatures, lawyers, clergymen, physicians, and philosophers to define death as the cessation of function of a certain body part (whether heart, brain, part of the brain, or whatever) have been misguided. The Definition of Death Rick Garlikov.
The attempts by legislatures, lawyers, clergymen, physicians, and philosophers to define death as the cessation of function of a certain body part (whether heart, brain, part of the brain, or whatever) have been misguided. Contemporary philosophy is the present period in the history of Western philosophy beginning at the early 20th century with the increasing professionalization of the discipline and the rise of analytic and continental philosophy..
The phrase "contemporary philosophy" is a piece of technical terminology in philosophy that refers to a specific period in the history of Western philosophy (namely. Christoffer Hallqvist, also known as Qrisse, is a computer scientist from iridis-photo-restoration.com reason for dedicating his spare time to Edgar Allan Poe is simply the love and respect he feels towards the author and his work.
Memento Mori, Memorialization, Spontaneous, Memorial, Virtual, Metaphors and Euphemisms, Mind-Body Problem, Miscarriage, Missing in Action, Moment of Death, Mortality. Prof Steven Luper on life and death - and the philosophy surrounding these subjects.